RE: Obamacare part 2
October 4, 2013 at 1:54 am
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2013 at 1:57 am by Raeven.)
I'm saying that any company that employs more than 100 full time workers and doesn't offer any group health care coverage is a crap company to work for in the first place. And you clearly don't understand that small employers employ most of the workers in this country.
As for "admitting" it is a factor, I don't. Creed has explained to you over and over again that there is no reason for a large employer to back away from offering coverage and instead pay the fine. How come the notion of that is so repugnant to you?
One last point: A principal reason that the PPACA came into existence is to help business become competitive again in the global market. Remember, the PPACA is based on what Republicans initially proposed decades ago. Health care costs are a massive drag on our economy and our ability to compete. Employers in the global market are the first to say so. We have got to remove the yoke of that expense from all employers.
I guess your tactic is to just get nasty when the facts don't support the position you wish to espouse.
As for "admitting" it is a factor, I don't. Creed has explained to you over and over again that there is no reason for a large employer to back away from offering coverage and instead pay the fine. How come the notion of that is so repugnant to you?
One last point: A principal reason that the PPACA came into existence is to help business become competitive again in the global market. Remember, the PPACA is based on what Republicans initially proposed decades ago. Health care costs are a massive drag on our economy and our ability to compete. Employers in the global market are the first to say so. We have got to remove the yoke of that expense from all employers.
I guess your tactic is to just get nasty when the facts don't support the position you wish to espouse.
