Obamacare part 2

[Raeven]

And why so nasty? Will you admit you, too, were incorrect that employers won't pay the penalty, AND that the correct amount is $2,000?

Nasty? Do I sense a prude? Seriously, I used the most versatile word int the English language once, and at that as an adverb, and I get accused of being nasty? Or, am I accused of being nasty because of my forceful employment of fact?

I am not wrong: 2k for employers that don't meet the requirement, 2.5k for individuals. I guess you didn't read all 2k pages. See, another example of corporate cow-towing. Blind and obedient Obama cock-suckers should realize that the Affordable Care Act has never been tried under the 14th Amendment. I don't think when it is, that it will last knowing that corporations and government employees are exempted at whim. I say 'at whim' since there is no exemption provision in the Act.

LOL, your "forceful employment of fact" stands for itself here in this thread. I am surely not concerned over that. It's been pretty amusing, actually.

You ARE wrong. You said employers had no liability, only individuals. Wrong.

I have not mentioned the impact of the PPACA on individuals because the discussion at hand is about its impact on employers. I think you missed that. You slammed into the conversation with a whole slew of misstatements and personal attacks, and now wish to be lauded as if you were an oracle. Not looking good for that so far.