(October 13, 2013 at 2:03 am)FallentoReason Wrote: I've read the article you linked Min in closer detail. There's some things that aren't adding up to me:
Quote:The collapse was caused by fire initially fed by the jet fuel from the planes.
Science: Using original construction blueprints, photographs, and construction data, Purdue University, along with the American Society of Civil Engineers, created a model structure of the north World Trade Center tower and a scaled 767 jetliner. To model the fuel load, Purdue launched aluminum cans filled with liquid to represent an airline wing colliding with a steel column. The final simulation showed the internal destruction of supporting columns, the disintegration of the jetliner, the atomizing of the fuel, and the resulting fires that softened the steel framework of the building and brought it down.
The AE911Truth team stated that it was the American Society of Civil Engineers themselves that violated the usual procedure of investigating a collapsed building. If this is true, then it puts the post-research they did into question.
Do they have evidence that they violated procedure and if so what type of procedure are we talking about? Violating protocol doesn't necessarily mean that the results have to be forfeited, sometimes exceptions have to be made and I'll assume WTC was a special case when it comes to investigation.
