RE: I believe 9/11 was an inside job now
October 14, 2013 at 11:58 am
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2013 at 11:58 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(October 14, 2013 at 11:52 am)FallentoReason Wrote:Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:I just want to know what the idea of 9/11 being false flag was to achieve.
I personally am not interested in that. All I'm seeking to do in this thread is to establish if any of the WTC buildings fell because of damage or an alleged controlled demolition. Once that isolated question is answered.. well, maybe naturally some other stuff falls into place...
Just my 2c.
But I mean, the whole issue of a FF Op is because of the results it would produce (one would presume, anyway). Most proponents of this theory say "Oh so the US could get oil!". I reject those claims as silly because, honestly, if the US wanted to get oil (say, from Iraq), they could have just played the terrorist/saddam/some other card at any time anyway.
But fair enough if you just want to analyse the actual act itself. My question really is why everyone just focuses on the Twin Towers but ignores the fact 2 other planes went into buildings (or tried to), and why nobody claims there were explosives (or whatever) in those buildings either. Imagine explosives in the White House?
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.