RE: I believe 9/11 was an inside job now
October 14, 2013 at 12:02 pm
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2013 at 12:05 pm by FallentoReason.)
F_C Wrote:But fair enough if you just want to analyse the actual act itself. My question really is why everyone just focuses on the Twin Towers but ignores the fact 2 other planes went into buildings (or tried to), and why nobody claims there were explosives (or whatever) in those buildings either. Imagine explosives in the White House?
If the WTC buildings really were demolished, then explosives in the White House would be a walk in the park. It would be the people that planned the attack rigging their own HQ with explosives to make it seem like the White House also got attacked. But see, such a whacky possibility necessarily depends on how the WTC buildings collapsed.
(October 14, 2013 at 12:02 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:In another section of my video, a demolition expert says that the penthouse collapsing first is evidence of an implosion i.e. the demolition taking place.
But other demolition experts.... the ones NOT interviewed for the video...came to the opposite conclusion. Seems like cherry-picking.
That's true. I guess since it's expert vs expert, we can't really use the penthouse as evidence for either view, especially because both views apparently depend on the penthouse collapsing first anyways.
Quote:Besides, in actual controlled demo tapes the explosions are at the bottom and the bottom falls first.
That's also true.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle