Oh for fuck's sake with this "the twin towers were brought down by a controlled demolition." If you look at the video from the street level of the building collapsing, the camera looking upward sees the top of one of the towers coming down, and briefly shows the base of the tower which is still completely intact. No blown out windows, no evidence of any explosions at street level, nothing. The towers collapsed from the top down.
As far as WTC7 is concerned, why even bother demolishing it after it was heavily damaged from buildings 1 and 2 collapsing? It didn't fall until quite some time later, so why even bother bringing it down on purpose? Or why not demolish it right after the twin towers fell?
This is just another instance of conspiracy theorists harping on one or two details which, in their mind, means the entire official story is totally 100% wrong and the conspiracy theory right by default.
As far as WTC7 is concerned, why even bother demolishing it after it was heavily damaged from buildings 1 and 2 collapsing? It didn't fall until quite some time later, so why even bother bringing it down on purpose? Or why not demolish it right after the twin towers fell?
This is just another instance of conspiracy theorists harping on one or two details which, in their mind, means the entire official story is totally 100% wrong and the conspiracy theory right by default.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
