(October 16, 2013 at 12:01 am)Lion IRC Wrote: No - I contest that claim. So do the stats about partner-on-partner violence, self harm, sexually transmitted disease...It's a good thing violence, self-harm and disease is never a factor in straight relationships!
Quote:I think you need glasses. I did not accuse you. I asked you what you thought about pet brothels and animal consent.
I think it says a lot about how hateful Christians are that so many of them resort to comparisons like this when homosexuality is on topic.
(October 15, 2013 at 10:48 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Make up your mind. You just got through telling me that what gay people do should be none of my business. Now you are asking me to consider the question. Do I ignore stuff that doesnt affect me or do I give it consideration and take a position?So, what you're saying is that you should have the right to harm people if you occasionally help people?
That applies to every moral/ethical question - not JUST feeding the hungry or making changes to family law. Are you a humanist?
(October 15, 2013 at 10:48 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: You just argued that I should not stick my nose into stuff that doesnt affect me (SSM). Now you are saying I am a stake-holder in a womans pregnancy.If you are in favor of banning abortions, you have already made yourself a stakeholder in every woman's pregnancy.hock: