RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
October 18, 2013 at 1:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 18, 2013 at 1:03 pm by Doubting Thomas.)
(October 18, 2013 at 10:46 am)Minimalist Wrote: The fact that these guys were in the lobby - so they say - and survived is ample proof that what they heard were not explosions from a controlled demolition. They would have been killed when the building fell down on their head.
Not to mention the fact that people were still coming out of the buildings as they fell. If a basement explosion occurred, one big enough to bring the buildings down, then nobody would have made it out of the lobby since the floor would have collapsed into the basement.
But again, the solid evidence are the videos which show the top of the buildings collapsing while the base was still intact. That's not how you conduct a controlled demolition.
(October 18, 2013 at 12:59 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Anyone who opposes a conspiracy is in on it.
Right, and anyone who debunks conspiracy claims online is a "government disinformation agent."
Don't forget about official public denials. If a government agent denies that this or that conspiracy theory is true, then the official denial just proves the coverup. If on the small chance a government official says something which supports the idea a conspiracy theory is true, then that's official admission. Either way it's a win for the conspiratards, in their minds anyway.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.