(October 18, 2013 at 10:46 am)Minimalist Wrote: I disagree. I've served on juries and eye-witnesses are highly overrated. A competent defense attorney can reduce them to blubbering piles of goo on the witness stand because most people are about as observant as a loaf of bread. The forensic evidence is always more damning.
Like I said, we have forensic evidence also. You ignored that for some reason and simply commented on the eye-witness thing. But, here they are once again:
A danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC dust
New Proof 9/11 was an Inside job - Richard Gage
And you are right - forensic evidence is always more damning.
