RE: Calling Out Demolition Deniers
October 19, 2013 at 7:12 am
(This post was last modified: October 19, 2013 at 8:12 am by Rayaan.)
Creed and Min,
Your articles in the "debunking 911" website are nothing compared to the very detailed and comprehensive study done by scientists and architects which was published in a peer-reviewed Chemical Physics journal. The title of that paper is "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" and you can view the entire thing at the link below:
http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj...7TOCPJ.pdf
The paper ends with the statement:
Not to mention that the same opinion matches with everything in the post above, and with all the eyewitness accounts, and with the seismic wave evidence.
Coincidence?
Your articles in the "debunking 911" website are nothing compared to the very detailed and comprehensive study done by scientists and architects which was published in a peer-reviewed Chemical Physics journal. The title of that paper is "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" and you can view the entire thing at the link below:
http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj...7TOCPJ.pdf
The paper ends with the statement:
Quote:Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.
Not to mention that the same opinion matches with everything in the post above, and with all the eyewitness accounts, and with the seismic wave evidence.
Coincidence?
