Calling Out Demolition Deniers

[Rayaan]

Christ almighty, Clinton was firing cruise missiles into Afghanistan in 98' on account of prior terrorist attacks from terrorists sheltered in Afghanistan, long before 9/11, and you think that America having plans prior to 9/11 is evidence of a conspiracy?

I didn't say that was "evidence" of a conspiracy, but it does give more support to the conspiracy. You know that there is a difference between evidence and support.

Secondly, that was only a part of the reason why I think 9/11 was a conspiracy. I said many other things on 9/11 (in this thread and elswhere) but you just took out that one single argument from this whole thread and you ran with that one only. So what about the:

Eyewitness to the explosions
Seismic wave evidence
Evidence of active thermite in the buildings
CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer
The arrival of mysterious vans prior to the attacks
NORAD hijacking drills
Censorship of 9/11 whistleblowers
Destruction of the 9/11 tapes

and much more to come.


Looks like a lot of people forgot how to play 'connect the dots' ... oh well, sucks for you then ...

So this forum has a conspiracy wacko as an Administrator?

Wow. Just wow.

Just because I believe that 9/11 is a conspiracy doesn't mean that I'm a conspiracy wacko.

You also believe that all UFO sightings a conspiracy (and so do I), but does that necessarily mean that you're a "conspiracy wacko"?
And does that necessarily mean that you are wrong for believing that it's a conspiracy?

Of course, the answer is no.

Spam and conspiracy crap doesn't cut it here. I shouldn't be surprised, you also have an invisible friend.

I'll probably write the same thing in one of your threads one day when I disagree with you. It's a much better way to prove that someone is wrong, right?

"Spam and conspiracy crap doesn't cut it here."

Best response ever.