The links I provided cite sources from plenty of other sources that have confirmed the results of the plane crashes themselves being, to the letter, the one and only cause of the collapse of the towers. Again you have not addressed the simple fact that the impacts did not prematurely detonate nor jar any of the pre-planted explosives you and others have claimed existed at the scene of the attacks. Bombs are rather fickle devices...especially when they rely on thermite, which is a difficult enough material to work with for demolition or shaped purposes under ideal circumstances. It's been shown that the supports did not display any indicators of having been cut by thermite. The actual collapses themselves do not support the notion that the supports were cut by thermite charges, either, with several support elements being shown to have been broken at vastly different points, with most of them being seen with their lower-most break points being clearly seen with evidence instead of having failed because of sudden impact of thousands upon thousands of tons of weight crushing them and breaking them apart. On top of this is the fact that both towers were noted to have started collapsing at the top, with the initial downwards thrust falling upon the areas of impact, before the rest of the structures collapsed. If the bottom of the structures had been the reason for their collapse, this would not be the case; the collapse would have started at the lowermost points, with the structures having impacted down onto the ground from the cutting of the structural supports. Such was not the case. The blasts seen at the bottom happened immediately upon the upper portion coming down onto the points where the crashes had taken place. This would have been caused by the downward impact of the entire weight of the upper portions of the structures causing immense downwards seismic forces, which is what also would have caused the few structural supports that were seen with angular 'cuts' to demonstrate such characteristics as the immense amount of force pushed them not inwards but rather outwards. Most would have snapped, but given the irregular drop of the buildings [another thing, by the way, I'll bring up], sideways shearing wouldn't be unlikely.
The buildings were also seen to collapse with a slight angle into the area of the jet impacts, though an outright outwards toppling did not occur due to the physics involved, though debris was seen to be launched further outwards in those directions. This is to be expected due to the flames being hottest near the points of impact, as well as from the damage done to them from the impacts of the planes. Furthermore, glass was seen to erupt outwards from the windows near the bottom upon the initial collapse in several videos which you can undoubtedly find on youtube, especially of the second collapse.
The timeframes of collapse after impact were also fairly consistent with variation clearly being based on impact points. On top of what steel-workers and metallurgists have shown, the collapse of the buildings more or less happened within timeframes consistent with the loss of the structures' tensile strength, but only in retrospect. See, given the information on the loss of tensile strength given the heat applied, this essentially means the buildings were all but guaranteed to collapse at those timeframes. With this in mind, if the government was responsible, they would not have bothered with explosives, they would probably have been entirely aware of these circumstances and not have bothered, but the fact that conspiracy theorists and demolition assertionists continue to use this as the axiom of the entire affair displays that the foundation for it all is completely erroneous. This would also require the government to have orchestrated the attack by utilizing suicide jihadists who were affiliated with al-Qaeda.
This is untenable because while Osama welcomed US aid in Afghanistan when the Soviets invaded, he was largely silent up until the establishment of US bases in Saudi Arabia prior to the Gulf War because of his religious fanaticism. It is after this point that he began directing terrorist attacks against US assets with no benefit to the government whatsoever. It is stupidly irrational to believe that after these attacks that caused problems for the US government that suddenly he would switch his stance to working with the US again despite the presence of military bases still in Saudi Arabia which ran contrary to his overzealous beliefs. He needed no support from the US government to commit these attacks. They were prepared under the notice of the government.
Furthermore, there was nothing to gain by flying the plane into the Pentagon; this targeted essential US DoD personnel...and the DoD would have to be in on this. Meaning they'd be willing to sacrifice hundreds of personnel with high security clearance, essentially at random, too, and given high-echelon brass were present within the building it would mean they would be willing to die themselves for this hair-brained psychopathic endeavor. Finally, the fourth plane was brought down, and was intent on hitting the white house, again filled with important members of the administration, and was only stopped by the efforts of the brave souls aboard the plane who sacrificed their lives in a (successful) attempt to prevent their captors from causing any further damage.
On top of all this, Osama would also have been willing to allow the national government that enabled him his power and influence in the world to be pounded into the ground and rendered far less effectual in its capabilities for him, and would have been further willing to bog his resources down in a protracted insurgency, thus reducing his ability to strike at those he despised. This also does not account for the constant attacks against civilians, which would serve no purpose whatsoever towards enabling this conspiracy and instead would only make sense to be used as a means of destabilizing the economy of the country the conspiracy was supposedly intent on enforcing its control over, which would actually make that task harder, not easier.
None of this shit makes any fucking sense, Rayaan. You're grasping at straws and they're not even there for you to grab. The entire idea from the very beginning falls apart and after that the pieces get carried away by the force of simple logical deduction.
The government wasn't in on it. Not only is it ridiculously incapable of seeing its own international plots provide any payout worth the investments put in, it's also incapable of keeping shit like this a secret. Wikileaks has constantly gotten holds of hundreds of thousands of top-secret files and displayed them to the public. Are you not aware of the problem with complexity? The more complicated and intricate something gets, the more weaknesses and flaws and vulnerabilities present themselves.
Something of this scale and with this much complexity would have been exposed quite a while ago. One single whistleblower is all it would take; one guilty conscience. Human beings are not intrinsically evil. Being actively complicit in the mass murder of thousands of innocent fellow countrymen and women would eat at at least one person. By now, they would stewed more than long enough and what have broken.
The government wasn't in on it. Bush was, predictably, completely incapable of reacting to this situation effectively. The resulting hell-storm wrought on the Taliban and al-Qaeda was not a pre-determined course of action meant to be justified by a debilitating attack against the US; it was a reaction, and the initial ideas of attacking Afghanistan are sourced from a former Pakistani official. Forgive me if I have a hard time trusting the government of a nation that was either so incompetent that they didn't know the world's most wanted criminal was hiding right under their noses or they were such a bunch of backstabbing shitheads that they intentionally hid him from the rest of the world to protect him so that they could continue to profit from the "alliance" they had with the US via the aid programs being dumped into their country.
I, like so many others, declare this stupid conspiracy "theory" to be about as valid as the existence of Sasquatch.
The buildings were also seen to collapse with a slight angle into the area of the jet impacts, though an outright outwards toppling did not occur due to the physics involved, though debris was seen to be launched further outwards in those directions. This is to be expected due to the flames being hottest near the points of impact, as well as from the damage done to them from the impacts of the planes. Furthermore, glass was seen to erupt outwards from the windows near the bottom upon the initial collapse in several videos which you can undoubtedly find on youtube, especially of the second collapse.
The timeframes of collapse after impact were also fairly consistent with variation clearly being based on impact points. On top of what steel-workers and metallurgists have shown, the collapse of the buildings more or less happened within timeframes consistent with the loss of the structures' tensile strength, but only in retrospect. See, given the information on the loss of tensile strength given the heat applied, this essentially means the buildings were all but guaranteed to collapse at those timeframes. With this in mind, if the government was responsible, they would not have bothered with explosives, they would probably have been entirely aware of these circumstances and not have bothered, but the fact that conspiracy theorists and demolition assertionists continue to use this as the axiom of the entire affair displays that the foundation for it all is completely erroneous. This would also require the government to have orchestrated the attack by utilizing suicide jihadists who were affiliated with al-Qaeda.
This is untenable because while Osama welcomed US aid in Afghanistan when the Soviets invaded, he was largely silent up until the establishment of US bases in Saudi Arabia prior to the Gulf War because of his religious fanaticism. It is after this point that he began directing terrorist attacks against US assets with no benefit to the government whatsoever. It is stupidly irrational to believe that after these attacks that caused problems for the US government that suddenly he would switch his stance to working with the US again despite the presence of military bases still in Saudi Arabia which ran contrary to his overzealous beliefs. He needed no support from the US government to commit these attacks. They were prepared under the notice of the government.
Furthermore, there was nothing to gain by flying the plane into the Pentagon; this targeted essential US DoD personnel...and the DoD would have to be in on this. Meaning they'd be willing to sacrifice hundreds of personnel with high security clearance, essentially at random, too, and given high-echelon brass were present within the building it would mean they would be willing to die themselves for this hair-brained psychopathic endeavor. Finally, the fourth plane was brought down, and was intent on hitting the white house, again filled with important members of the administration, and was only stopped by the efforts of the brave souls aboard the plane who sacrificed their lives in a (successful) attempt to prevent their captors from causing any further damage.
On top of all this, Osama would also have been willing to allow the national government that enabled him his power and influence in the world to be pounded into the ground and rendered far less effectual in its capabilities for him, and would have been further willing to bog his resources down in a protracted insurgency, thus reducing his ability to strike at those he despised. This also does not account for the constant attacks against civilians, which would serve no purpose whatsoever towards enabling this conspiracy and instead would only make sense to be used as a means of destabilizing the economy of the country the conspiracy was supposedly intent on enforcing its control over, which would actually make that task harder, not easier.
None of this shit makes any fucking sense, Rayaan. You're grasping at straws and they're not even there for you to grab. The entire idea from the very beginning falls apart and after that the pieces get carried away by the force of simple logical deduction.
The government wasn't in on it. Not only is it ridiculously incapable of seeing its own international plots provide any payout worth the investments put in, it's also incapable of keeping shit like this a secret. Wikileaks has constantly gotten holds of hundreds of thousands of top-secret files and displayed them to the public. Are you not aware of the problem with complexity? The more complicated and intricate something gets, the more weaknesses and flaws and vulnerabilities present themselves.
Something of this scale and with this much complexity would have been exposed quite a while ago. One single whistleblower is all it would take; one guilty conscience. Human beings are not intrinsically evil. Being actively complicit in the mass murder of thousands of innocent fellow countrymen and women would eat at at least one person. By now, they would stewed more than long enough and what have broken.
The government wasn't in on it. Bush was, predictably, completely incapable of reacting to this situation effectively. The resulting hell-storm wrought on the Taliban and al-Qaeda was not a pre-determined course of action meant to be justified by a debilitating attack against the US; it was a reaction, and the initial ideas of attacking Afghanistan are sourced from a former Pakistani official. Forgive me if I have a hard time trusting the government of a nation that was either so incompetent that they didn't know the world's most wanted criminal was hiding right under their noses or they were such a bunch of backstabbing shitheads that they intentionally hid him from the rest of the world to protect him so that they could continue to profit from the "alliance" they had with the US via the aid programs being dumped into their country.
I, like so many others, declare this stupid conspiracy "theory" to be about as valid as the existence of Sasquatch.
