Calling Out Demolition Deniers

[Aractus]

I know a lot of this was already discussed in 9/11's mother thread, but I wanted to put the following videos in a separate thread because I want more people to see them and I personally find them very compelling in support of the claim that bombs were implanted inside the buildings. And of course, then I would like to know what your opinions are on the eyewitness accounts provided therein.

Rayaan, with all due respect. You may be a mod here, but you are an idiot if you believe that 9/11 was an "inside job", and an even bigger one if you believe that explosives were planted prior to the jets hitting 1/2 WTC.

I've considered this conspiracy before. And I'm well on record as saying that I do not believe Martin Bryant killed anyone on 28/04/1996, and I'm annoyed that more people are not concerned about the possible conspiracy and the certain miscarriage of justice. See my post here. Andrew MacGregor and others found their way there, which proves to me that they do care about the truth.

Your first video talks about an explosion, nobody is claiming that explosions didn't take place. Of course they did, but they were triggered by the fire and structural damage of the jets hitting the towers, and they were not triggered by bombs.

In the second video the guy is obviously talking about the explosion of the 2nd plane hitting the south tower.

Now if your question is did the USA have intelligence that an attack was about to take place, the answer is absolutely. Nobody would disagree with this. But were they behind the attacks themselves? Of course not.

Now, the guy in the video estimated 10 minutes between the explosions. There was actually 17 minutes between the north and the south towers being hit - 17 minutes, so are you sure you want to take his account as gospel truth?

---

Honestly, my biggest problem is the lack of whistleblowers (and of the one that exists, the lack of evidence she actually ever worked for the CIA). To believe any of the conspiracy, you have to belief that out of the thousands of people involved, either none of then have ever come forward with actual evidence they were involved, or they were all killed afterwards (and if that is the case, why haven't their families started asking questions?).

In an age where whistleblowing is becoming more popular, that just doesn't make much sense to me.

The biggest problem IMHO is 7 WTC, which was not hit by a plane. There was no reason to CD it according to the conspiracy theory, and there was no way to know in advance what structural damage it might sustain from the hits to 1/2 WTC.