Calling Out Demolition Deniers

[Rayaan]

On the issue of Susan Lindauer, do you care to comment on the fact that she has presented no hard evidence that she ever actually worked for the CIA,

Maybe she has no hard evidence for that, but that doesn't necessarily mean that there is no good reason to support her claim either, i.e. that she worked for the CIA.

Susan used to cover anti-terrorism at the Iraqi Embassy in New York from 1996 up to the invasion.

She also told some of her friends and other people about an attack on America that would occur at around August or September of 2001 and she also knew that the attack would involve the use of airplanes and explosives, which this is mentioned in many different websites, two of them which I already linked to in this post ... and all of this is more support for her claim that she did have CIA connections.


After she was finally allowed to stand in trial, it was confirmed by the witnesses present there that she was an intelligence asset and that she did warn people about 9/11.

Listen to this from 7:27 to 8:00:




In her book "Extreme Prejudice," she has revealed some of her discussions with her CIA-handler Richard Fuisz, many of the things which led her to resign from her position and then come out as a whistleblower, and she also talks about him in the videos that I saw. This matches with the allegation that Richard Fuisz has been a CIA asset long before September 11, and when he was asked about his relationship with the CIA, he said the following:

Between 1994 and 2001, Fuisz and anti-war Susan Lindauer met weekly to discuss her diplomatic contacts in the Middle East, specifically her work related to the lifting of U.S. sanctions against Libya and Iraq. When asked by the New York Times to comment on The Sunday Herald article and on his relationship to the CIA more generally, Fuisz remarked that "This is not an issue I can confirm or deny. I am not allowed to speak about these issues. In fact, I can't even explain why I can't speak about these issues." Fuisz's meetings with Lindauer ended abruptly on September 11, 2001, due to what Fuisz described as an increasingly "seditious bent" to their discussions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Fui...connection

Richard Fuisz being a CIA agent was also reported in a Sunday Herald newspaper in May of 2000 (as I quoted below).

It also acknowledges his connection with Susan Lindauer ... coincidence?

A FORMER CIA agent who claims Libya is not responsible for the Lockerbie bombing is being gagged by the US government under state secrecy laws and faces 10 years in prison if he reveals any information about the terrorist attack.

United Nations diplomats are outraged that the US government is apparently suppressing a potential key trial witness. Diplomats are now demanding that the CIA agent, Dr Richard Fuisz, be released from the gagging order. Fuisz, a multi-millionaire businessman and pharmaceutical researcher, was, according to US intelligence sources, the CIA's key operative in the Syrian capital Damascus during the 1980s where he also had business interests.

http://911review.org/Lindauer/LindauerPa...Herald.txt


I have already posted all this information in the other thread, but you didn't respond to that for some reason (hmmm I wonder why ). I re-posted them here since you asked me once again.

Good luck getting back to me this time.

and that twice she has been found not mentally fit to stand trial.

So do you have any "hard evidence" that she was mentally unfit to stand a trial? And if not, then what is your justification for that position?

And in what way exactly was she mentally unfit?

If a key witness to these supposed vans filled with explosives is actually a crazy person / liar, then it kinda puts a dent in your theory.

And that's an "IF" ... and you don't know if the "IF" is actually true. You didn't provide a good reasoning either.

Mpre importantly, as I wrote in my response to Creed, there is not only one whistleblower. There have been many and you just didn't know about them - see below:

http://www.corbettreport.com/meet-the-91...leblowers/

^ Are they ALL crazy and liars? And is the whistleblower Sibel Edmonds (see the post above) a crazy person also? I don't think so. They themselves know how much of a danger they are putting themselves in by blowing the whistle on the US government, and they know that many other whistleblowers have faced severe punishments and threats from high-level authorities and years and years of prison time ... yet here they are fighting and risking their own lives to expose the lies and corruption.


But hey, you learn something new everyday ...