RE: Christian Paradox
January 29, 2010 at 9:10 pm
(This post was last modified: January 29, 2010 at 9:11 pm by Ace Otana.)
(January 29, 2010 at 8:55 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: So assuming 'God' you logically compose fixed morals. Assuming 'not God' morality isn't fixed and isn't really morality is it ...If anyone gets to decide what's moral?
Lets get beer
There is morality, it's just subjective. Really there are no universal laws to abide by. We can do what the fuck we want but it's because we choose not to and to bring no harm to others, to aid others and to write up laws that protect not destroy that makes us logical, reasonable intelligent beings. It seems we can live socially without the need for absalute laws. Have you noticed how hot and lengthy debates can be when discussing ethics? It's because everyone seems to have their own opinion on the subject. Very subjective.
Now I must insist that we have sparkle wine darling. Then we can go paint the town red! I'll get the brushes!
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
