Looks like we're all pretty much in agreement about whether it matters or not if a person named Jesus existed historically or not.
But the simple fact that all evidence for that is nonexistent must be a constant thorn in the sides of Christians everywhere. Not only do they have a greater burden of proof claiming that he was the son of a god, but they also have problems showing that he actually existed in the first place and the gospel stories aren't just fabrications.
But the simple fact that all evidence for that is nonexistent must be a constant thorn in the sides of Christians everywhere. Not only do they have a greater burden of proof claiming that he was the son of a god, but they also have problems showing that he actually existed in the first place and the gospel stories aren't just fabrications.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
