Looking at that,I just had a thought (no really) About 'irreducible complexity'
Could the an equal argument be made: Complexity such as that found in say the eye or the platypus is exactly what one would expect from chance. Nature is more like Heath Robinson than Da Vinci. All that is needed is for a thing to work.
Surely an intelligent designer of all things would produce elegant simplicity? Or am I simply arguing from personal incredulity? Oh well,tit for tat,which is all intelligent design merits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Heath_Robinson
Could the an equal argument be made: Complexity such as that found in say the eye or the platypus is exactly what one would expect from chance. Nature is more like Heath Robinson than Da Vinci. All that is needed is for a thing to work.
Surely an intelligent designer of all things would produce elegant simplicity? Or am I simply arguing from personal incredulity? Oh well,tit for tat,which is all intelligent design merits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Heath_Robinson
