RE: Rule Changes + New Restrictions
November 13, 2013 at 8:51 pm
(This post was last modified: November 13, 2013 at 8:51 pm by Mystical.)
(November 13, 2013 at 8:33 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:(November 13, 2013 at 8:27 pm)missluckie26 Wrote: Like Max Greece, I should probably read the rules. But I'm pretty sure my post was just as relevant as yours because who the hell doesn't think about thumbs up butts when you bring up a thumb representing JohnV? I know not.
Ps. "worthit"
See... that's just the thing, my dear: there are two kinds of people in this world. Those who have, and those who don't. When it comes to examining the relevancy of a post, and distinguishing whether I might make any particular post: I've got that. When it comes to large breasts, nonsensical one-liners, and single image posts that hardly respond properly to previous text: I don't.
"Our positions are reversed: my spring; your fall."
Savvy?
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.