(February 6, 2010 at 6:05 pm)Darwinian Wrote: Examples? Let's have a go
Understood: Whilst science certainly doesn't understand everything it certainly understands far more about the phenomena detailed in this thread than any creationist viewpoint.
In other words it isn't possible that a scientist in any of the fields concerned primarily with the images given and more knowledgable than yourself in his / her field could believe in creation?
(February 6, 2010 at 6:05 pm)Darwinian Wrote: Predicted: Of course, Black Holes (for example) were predicted long before any evidence of them was observed. Creationism hadn't to my knowledge, predicted them beforehand.
Is this as impressive as Star Trek predicting cell phones? Has science ever predicted anything wrong in your eyes? How much is now known about black holes?
(February 6, 2010 at 6:05 pm)Darwinian Wrote: Explained: Science does a very good job at explaining these amazing things, that, you cannot rationally deny.
Not at all.
(February 6, 2010 at 6:05 pm)Darwinian Wrote: Creationism only explains the ignorance of those minds that are closed to logic and reason and seek anthropic explanations for things that are outside their narrow view of reality.
Are you suggesting that I am an ignorant closed minded illogical person with a narrow view of reality? Because, if and when we really start to discuss my idea of creationism you might have to brush up on your Hebrew and Greek and Latin. Making some readjustments in your own thinking.
