(November 18, 2013 at 7:33 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: No, my reading of the bible is, I think, honest. But my opinion is different to my reading of the bible. To put it another way my opinion is not wholly based on my reading of the bible. I (I think) read what the Bible said about heaven and hell, dismissed it, and formed a different view based on, but not following what the Bible says. Does that make any sense?
I get what you're saying, but then I'm not sure why you would do that. How can you be sure your views comport with reality, and aren't just things you've spun based on your own preferences and modern sensibilities?
These are existential claims, after all; opinion doesn't factor into the process at all, and if you're taking any part of this to be true, you're risking your eternal soul by doing so. Maybe not in the case of Jesus' robe, but with regards to the lake of fire stuff, and especially how one ends up there, what you've interpreted things to mean now is meaningless; the rules are set regardless of what you've taken them to say, and the more you differ from the scriptures, the more you stray from the one objective piece of direct address your religion has.
I appreciate your candor and level headedness, and I'm not trying to stir shit or anything, but it seems to me you've, at least in part, invented your own version of christianity, according to your own perspectives and opinions and, at that point... what's the point?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!