RE: Refuting Evolution
November 21, 2013 at 2:56 am
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2013 at 3:00 am by Muslim Scholar.)
(November 17, 2013 at 11:01 pm)Deidre32 Wrote: Muslim Scholar,Actually I'm not refuting evolution; it may happened
Why is it necessary to refute evolution in order to prove God's existence? Do you feel that in order to follow your religion, you also can't accept the theory of evolution? Is it because Darwin's theory doesn't of course support a theist's belief that humans have souls? And this would throw a monkey wrench into the whole heaven/hell concoction?
Help me understand your point. No, I didn't read this entire thread.
I'm refuting nu-intelligent evolution
Any person who understands statistics, will know that for evolution to happen; billions and billions of ridiculous, non-sense, with nonfunctional organs, etc. must exist
(November 12, 2013 at 2:41 am)Beccs Wrote: Whenever someone states that they can refute evolution I always have to wonder why they haven't managed to write a science paper, get it peer-reviewed, and then published.Because non-intelligent evolution is more of a religion than science
Such refutation for what is a fundamental science, and a science that has given birth to other scientific disciplines would be a guarantee for a Nobel Prize.
Of course, they always make the claim that such research and science exists but there's an international conspiracy among scientists to keep that evidence suppressed.
Of course, this is nonsense since science is a cut throat field and many scientists would jump at the chance for the fame and funding such a revelation would get.
If you read any "research" about that, you will notice from the first moment the amount of pathetic trials of explaining the non-existence of evolution evidence and gaps, etc.