Refuting Evolution

[Esquilax]

Any person who understands statistics, will know that for evolution to happen; billions and billions of ridiculous, non-sense, with nonfunctional organs, etc. must exist

And then when those are pointed out to you- plus the fact that over ninety percent of the species ever to exist on earth are dead due to exactly that- you dishonestly move the goalposts to something even more vague. You aren't interested in having a conversation, you're interested in gloating: stop pretending.

Because non-intelligent evolution is more of a religion than science
If you read any "research" about that, you will notice from the first moment the amount of pathetic trials of explaining the non-existence of evolution evidence and gaps, etc.

Yes, you're exactly right: non-directed evolution is a religion, because there's some benefit- that you just haven't mentioned, I'm sure- to adhering to that regardless of the facts. Despite the fact that proving an intelligence behind evolution would earn a Nobel Prize at the least, and millions of dollars at most. Despite the fact that success in science is results based, in terms of applicability. Despite the fact that intentionally getting things wrong gets one discredited in science. It's a religion.

A religion that every last mainstream scientist, in every culture across the world, including those that are religious, is a member of, and that not a single one of them, ever, have ever gone against, despite the immense personal success such a thing would grant them. Clearly.

That's much more sensible than the alternative, which is that you are flat fucking wrong.

You're right: a global conspiracy against the interests of every last one of its participants must be the right way.