That's fucked, I didn't see that part telling me the first article was written by friggin movie stars. Oh well, I stand by the fact the it seems to be a strong study about the neurotoxicity of modern vaccines, and maybe of thimerisol of heavy metal based adjuvants.
"We were unable to identify pre-clinical or prospective neurotoxicity studies that assessed the
safety of this policy."
Where are the studies that the FDA and other watchdogs had to require before approving these vaccines? Why could these doctors not find the saftey testing that should have existed before this idea (of heavy metal laced vaccines to improve shelf life) was ever approved? Did they do any neurotoxicity tests, and these doctors can't find it? Was it misplaced?
I am not sold on Thimerisol either. I know that most people have the ability to leech heavy metals out (through the tubes of our hair, seriously) and so may be able to remove thimerisol from their own selves. But there are people who are unable to do this well enough, and they are the ones who react badly to 36 vaccines and get early stage heavy metal poisoning, which is a large portion of the so called "autism spectrum" problem. The question is whether or not using mercury based adjuvants is the best option for the makers. Is there a way we can administer Vaccines that poses no risk of neurotoxic effect? Or even a significantly reduced risk? Can these companies be taken to task if we feel that they have made a shoddy and poor quality product that may have saftey concerns if forced on children?
I just like to question things, but you guys please feel free to trust blindly. Thank you.
"We were unable to identify pre-clinical or prospective neurotoxicity studies that assessed the
safety of this policy."
Where are the studies that the FDA and other watchdogs had to require before approving these vaccines? Why could these doctors not find the saftey testing that should have existed before this idea (of heavy metal laced vaccines to improve shelf life) was ever approved? Did they do any neurotoxicity tests, and these doctors can't find it? Was it misplaced?
I am not sold on Thimerisol either. I know that most people have the ability to leech heavy metals out (through the tubes of our hair, seriously) and so may be able to remove thimerisol from their own selves. But there are people who are unable to do this well enough, and they are the ones who react badly to 36 vaccines and get early stage heavy metal poisoning, which is a large portion of the so called "autism spectrum" problem. The question is whether or not using mercury based adjuvants is the best option for the makers. Is there a way we can administer Vaccines that poses no risk of neurotoxic effect? Or even a significantly reduced risk? Can these companies be taken to task if we feel that they have made a shoddy and poor quality product that may have saftey concerns if forced on children?
I just like to question things, but you guys please feel free to trust blindly. Thank you.
