More vaccine doubts

[Pippy]

Hey,

The Wakefield MMR paper is a benchmark for bullshit agenda-driven science.

Oh. I did not realize when i stumbled onto it that this was the famous Lancet case... I realize now the incredulity, and double face palms I incurred. I apologize for sticking my foot in my mouth, and thank you for taking the time to show me how to remove it lest I star chewing...

You ingest more heavy metals from a fresh salmon than all 36 vaccines combined.

But let us not split hairs. I have already argued with you before about my problems with the pollution issue, and I tend to think these salmon do not naturally produce heavy metals in the levels they now carry. The fact that the salmon is neurotoxic does not make the vaccines safe or unsafe, it is kind of a red herring... get it?

Also, heavy metal poisoning has NOTHING to do with Autism. Autism is a genetically based neurological disease, you can inject any fucking thing you can think of into your body and i will guarantee that you will NEVER develop autism.

Oh, I also am fully aware of that. It is that some suspect that the landslide endemic of children getting disorders in the so-called "autism spectrum" (including Aspergers, which is troubling but not disabling) may be misdiagnoses of heavy metal poisoning, or some other early stage neurotoxic reaction to some part of the medical regimen. I know they don't literally develop autism from anything beside genetics and chance mutation. But the Thimerisol and autism argument is a small part of a lrger argument about vaccine saftey and health concerns. If it turns out that Thimerisol does have no effect, than we must keep trying to find what is causing these problems. We are not Luddites trying to scare people into not taking medicine, but active citizens asking questions and concerned for our own saftey...

So I acknowledge that heavy metal poisoning doesn't give you autism, but that I still have concerns with seeming cost-cutting in the name of profit over maximum efficacy and saftey...

Not only that but you linked to one of the most widely discredited studies in medical history, the single most discredited one in terms of vaccines.

You might ask a lot of questions, but it is becoming more and more obvious that you aren't actually interested in the answers, you just want to cherry pick what backs up your existing ideas.

I again apologize, and am red faced. I kind of wish I hadn't done that, but hey water under the bridge... I certainly am interested in answers, and I have to defend myself form your accusations. I never said "Here is what two silly film stars (shudder) have to say, see I'm right, I'm right". I said ""Here is something, what do you guys think?" The response: That is the famous discredited report. Oh. Shit. Thanks for pointing that out. I am not latching on to anything, and realize that I should cast scorn at the news site that put that up there. You guys were kind enough to point out my glaring error, and I think you for it and learn from it. I assure you that if I modify reality to fit my head, it is only accidentally and as all humans must inevitably. But I try my very best to see things as they are. Thank you for taking the time.

The Thimerisol/Autism thing may even be distractionary, that people with legitimate concern and worry about the actions of modern Pharma Corps, and the health consequences will get caught up in it. It would not be the first time such strong disinformation has been cast.

Thanks again, and again I apologize for wasting all of ours time.