The original study (the discredited one, not the one that is yet to be published) breached several ethics laws, including the extraction of blood from 5 year olds at a birthday party in return for £5. He also picked a statistically weighted sample of children to study, such that his results would be skewed to support his position all along.
I don't have any opinion on the monkey study, since it hasn't been published yet. It is being written by 12 different people, and as long as no ethics laws are breached, and the research is valid, I won't have any problems with its findings.
I don't have any opinion on the monkey study, since it hasn't been published yet. It is being written by 12 different people, and as long as no ethics laws are breached, and the research is valid, I won't have any problems with its findings.
