It depends on the goals of soceity. As we are finding out in my thread on morality, right and wrong are trivial ideals. A soceity who bans pot looks to try and keep its citizens with sharp and acute minds. (Look at America's Industrial Age when the substance was first bann, look at China now) verses a soceity who wishes to subdue the masses usually as away to implement massive change. Pot makes people passive, and easier to control. Look how drugs are not only allowed but forced onto the people in warlord controlled parts of Africa. Not to say we are going to be like Somalia, but at the same time where would the US be if the founding Father's were baked out of their minds 80% of the waking life?
That said if the people want slaves, let them have slaves. On the same hand if they want pot them them smoke pot. Who cares what you do or how you justify it. In the end know there is a standard in which we can not escape judgement. So no matter what you deny or justify it is to God we must given an account.
That said if the people want slaves, let them have slaves. On the same hand if they want pot them them smoke pot. Who cares what you do or how you justify it. In the end know there is a standard in which we can not escape judgement. So no matter what you deny or justify it is to God we must given an account.
