Sigh.
Nineteen, what am I going to do with you?
I'm really finding it hard to keep up with you as you seem insistent on changing your position as much as I change my socks. Which is a lot, in case anyone gets the wrong idea.
What is so objectionable about embracing new ideas? People do that all the time, when presented with compelling enough reason. Your asking questions is a reasonable but only if you can stomach the answers that we are giving you. The problem you're trying to impose is you want us to accept your ideas merely at your word. That's neither reasonable nor the way it works.
Let's start by examining your claims and where they come from. You say that human evolution is an atheist conspiracy. Okay, I'm an atheist. Am I part of this conspiracy? You see, if you go around making claims about a group of people to their face, you bet your wig you have to justify them with some evidence. Nobody will get this reference but the late, great Tony Hancock, after his character in his radio show was accused of wrongdoing with the phrase "Men like you ought to be locked up", replied "I agree, but not without knowing why!"
So where did you get the idea that human evolution is an atheist conspiracy? Please point me in the direction of our accusers. I want to see what else they're saying.
Maybe, just maybe, they have an agenda of their own.
Nineteen, what am I going to do with you?
I'm really finding it hard to keep up with you as you seem insistent on changing your position as much as I change my socks. Which is a lot, in case anyone gets the wrong idea.
What is so objectionable about embracing new ideas? People do that all the time, when presented with compelling enough reason. Your asking questions is a reasonable but only if you can stomach the answers that we are giving you. The problem you're trying to impose is you want us to accept your ideas merely at your word. That's neither reasonable nor the way it works.
Let's start by examining your claims and where they come from. You say that human evolution is an atheist conspiracy. Okay, I'm an atheist. Am I part of this conspiracy? You see, if you go around making claims about a group of people to their face, you bet your wig you have to justify them with some evidence. Nobody will get this reference but the late, great Tony Hancock, after his character in his radio show was accused of wrongdoing with the phrase "Men like you ought to be locked up", replied "I agree, but not without knowing why!"
So where did you get the idea that human evolution is an atheist conspiracy? Please point me in the direction of our accusers. I want to see what else they're saying.
Maybe, just maybe, they have an agenda of their own.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
