RE: Legal Pot or Jim Crow
December 4, 2013 at 3:12 pm
(December 3, 2013 at 6:49 pm)Ryantology Wrote: (November 30, 2013 at 4:56 pm)Drich Wrote: It depends on the goals of soceity. As we are finding out in my thread on morality, right and wrong are trivial ideals. A soceity who bans pot looks to try and keep its citizens with sharp and acute minds. (Look at America's Industrial Age when the substance was first bann, look at China now) verses a soceity who wishes to subdue the masses usually as away to implement massive change. Pot makes people passive, and easier to control. Look how drugs are not only allowed but forced onto the people in warlord controlled parts of Africa. Not to say we are going to be like Somalia, but at the same time where would the US be if the founding Father's were baked out of their minds 80% of the waking life?
"THE EFFECTS OF REEFER", by someone who has very obviously never used it and knows virtually nothing about it. Ask your local internet forum for details.
What is the statute of limitations on the sale and distrbution transportation of pot over state lines?
