RE: Christian Paradox
February 15, 2010 at 12:19 pm
(This post was last modified: February 15, 2010 at 12:20 pm by Watson.)
"it's intellectually dishonest to assume or accept existance of something BEFORE you test it's validity. it's backwards thinking."
Tell that to Sherlock. His mothod was to assume and accepy the identity of the criminal he was chasing, and then to collect supporting evidence as to the individuality of that suspect. Most of his superiors thought he was chasing ghosts- that is, until he caught them and they were exactly who hesaid they would be.
Minimalist -Someone still doesn't understand the Biiiible!
Tell that to Sherlock. His mothod was to assume and accepy the identity of the criminal he was chasing, and then to collect supporting evidence as to the individuality of that suspect. Most of his superiors thought he was chasing ghosts- that is, until he caught them and they were exactly who hesaid they would be.
Minimalist -Someone still doesn't understand the Biiiible!