RE: Christian Paradox
February 16, 2010 at 6:04 pm
(This post was last modified: February 16, 2010 at 6:06 pm by fr0d0.)
(February 16, 2010 at 10:19 am)tavarish Wrote: Am I also arrogant that I don't believe in Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny?
Don't change the subject... own your position.
[you continue to repeat the illogic we've already dismissed in another thread, which you refuse to address]
Conveniently your poor memory lets you repeat your blind assertions like they're actually still applicable.
(February 16, 2010 at 11:51 am)Rhizomorph13 Wrote:(February 16, 2010 at 5:12 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(February 16, 2010 at 1:14 am)Rhizomorph13 Wrote: Ahh so you also think you have some new approach. Well, I got news for you, many of us have been there and now we are here, sans God.
You say that like you're claiming unbelief is somehow the only logical conclusion, which is of course ridiculous. Not a valid conclusion. It's ironic how you keep bringing this up. Do you really believe that? I wish I could be as delusional. If that's the arrogance of disbelief (and I think I suffered the same delusion), it says something don't you think?
My non-belief is supported by the non-verifiable claus, Santa that is...
If there is no evidence for something that is supposedly everywhere, um, YES non-belief IS the only logical conclusion. Also the magic aether told me so while it was holding me to the Earth.
Rhizo
Fact is Rhiz... your position is no more sure than mine. My point. You shouldn't feel so self righteous as to infer superiority like you do.
If I believe in God, evidence is everywhere. If I don't, it isn't. I'm pretty sure you didn't need that pointing out to you. If you were expecting verifiable evidence of the transcendental... may I recommend counselling.
(February 16, 2010 at 2:24 pm)tavarish Wrote: God's about to get owned with a microscope.
LOL good luck with that one! I don't know who of you is more delusional, but then it seems you're well matched.