Christian Paradox

[Autumnlicious]

Don't change the subject... own your position.

[you continue to repeat the illogic we've already dismissed in another thread, which you refuse to address]

Conveniently your poor memory lets you repeat your blind assertions like they're actually still applicable.

You failed to refute those assertions, log them for all to see and merely insulted him. Please either correct that or consider your aforementioned statement as is quoted as lacking proof and therefore irrelevant to this discussion.

Fact is Rhiz... your position is no more sure than mine. My point. You shouldn't feel so self righteous as to infer superiority like you do.

If I believe in God, evidence is everywhere. If I don't, it isn't. I'm pretty sure you didn't need that pointing out to you. If you were expecting verifiable evidence of the transcendental... may I recommend counselling.

The position of lacking a belief in a deity is logical due to the lack of verifiable evidence of one. It doesn't dismiss such deity, simply is a lack of belief in it. Hence to a logical mind, one does not believe in a god. Since you stated that belief has a non-verifiable clause, which is inherently impossible to verify and hence a lack of belief is the only logical course (indecision until evidence is provided to make a decision), it appears to me that a logical being does not believe in any deity.

And please, do not recommend counseling - you are neither qualified to make such assertions and it is uncertain if you are being genuine or merely throwing out insults, as you did earlier in this thread.

LOL good luck with that one! I don't know who of you is more delusional, but then it seems you're well matched.

I am simply unable to state what is required in this context - it is obvious enough to make me cringe.