RE: Christian Paradox
February 17, 2010 at 5:57 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2010 at 6:00 pm by fr0d0.)
(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: Who's tavares?
That's you bud

(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: You make claims that God exists. Let me illustrate:
This should be good...
(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote:(February 17, 2010 at 2:14 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: I make no positive claim that God exists. that would be irrational of a transcendental entity - God just is ...and I believe he just is.
Look at the bold underlined. This is a claim that God exists. If you don't know what the word "claim" means.
Word swapping magic! Wow!

(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: Shit, man. In previous posts I even gave you the link for the meaning of "agnostic theist". What are you trying to argue?
Currently I'm classifying you as 'moron'.
(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: How do I know Christians know that a God exists?
More American imbeciles - yeah great... line em up.
(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: I'll repeat this
I noticed
(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: So certainty in church isn't certainty? It's not knowledge, but they have sunday schools and bible study to re-enforce this uncertain non-knowledge. Creationism also isn't taught as knowledge. Nope. Not at all.
You're getting further and further from reality. Try to understand what you're saying.
(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: You're mixing concepts and coming to a conclusion to fit your argument, but it makes no sense. In your definition, we can never know ANYTHING.
What concepts am I mixing? In my/ Christian definition we can know quite a lot. It's a pretty tight framework that is logically consistent. The error was yours in framing it inaccurately.
(February 17, 2010 at 3:05 pm)tavarish Wrote: I'm saying your faith is based on SOMETHING, a subjective experience you perceive as knowledge of the divine.
And you'd be totally wrong in my case.