(December 18, 2013 at 7:29 pm)Kitanetos Wrote: The problem I find with studies in relation to food and nutrition/health, is that they are constantly waffling.
One year, eggs are good for you. The next, they are bad for you. A couple of months later, eggs are good for you again. Till their bad for you again.
One year, coffee is good for you. The next, it is bad for you. A few months later, coffee is good for you again. Till it is bad for you again.
Etc.
Obvious answer is obvious. Cherry-pick the results.
I'm going with bacon and eggs being good for me. And wheat toast. With butter.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
