The Bible is the claim, not the evidence

[Statler Waldorf]

Typical SW response. I'm gonna need a moment to respond to this mound of bullshit but in a manner that won't be TL;DR for the others.

Take all the time in the world.

Science may make errors but at least it progresses

Progresses towards what? How do you know it is progressing and not regressing? How do you know that something ought to progress?

The real issue here is not disproving evolution, it is proving that the universe is only 6000 years old.

Why is that the real issue?

Man wrote the Bible, not GOD! I think god does not understand the concept of writing in English!

Men wrote the physical words, but what was written was inspired by God. The Bible was not written in English.

Also, The Lord of the Rings does not prove the existence of JRR Tolkien. It proves a human wrote the book!

Yes, a human named JRR Tolkien.

No, not censorship - I said it's not about the ideas but about the behavior of the poster.

I’ve never received an infraction on here or an official warning, so it must be the ideas and not the behavior.

And you won't find me whining about the made-up traits of an imagined god.

It doesn’t make a lot of sense but atheists do it all the time on here. They “know” God does not exist and they hate Him.

All his threads are tl;dr to me.

Not surprising, I use a lot of big words.

feather imprint photos

I believe the current understanding is that those are not feather imprints but imprints made by frayed structural collagen fibers per A new Chinese specimen indicates that ‘protofeathers’ in the Early Cretaceous theropod dinosaur Sinosauropteryx are degraded collagen fibres in the Proceedings of the Royal Society published May 23, 2007. There really is not much evidence supporting the notion that dinosaurs had feathers other than artistic conceptual renderings.

Citation.

EDIT: I see this is a lie that has been debunked already . Your evidence is dismissed as nonsense. Thanks for playing.

Calling this a lie is rather harsh, it’s just an older argument that creationists do not recommend using anymore (thus refuting the silly claim that creationism never progresses or changes).

http://creation.com/the-extinction-of-th...ick-freeze


"“Woolly mammoths were snap frozen during the Flood catastrophe.” This is contradicted by the geological setting in which mammoths are found. It’s most likely that they perished toward the end of the Ice Age, possibly in catastrophic dust storms. Partially digested stomach contents are not proof of a snap freeze, because the elephant’s stomach functions as a holding area—a mastodon with preserved stomach contents was found in mid-western USA, where the ground was not frozen."- Creation.com