(December 23, 2013 at 12:01 am)orangebox21 Wrote: Given that atheists don't believe in absolute truth.Sorry for my assumption that atheists don't believe in absolute truth. What is absolute truth for an atheist?
Without absolute truth no one can discern a lie.
Knowing something requires discerning truth from lies.
Atheists can't know anything.
Discuss.
(December 23, 2013 at 7:52 pm)MarxRaptor Wrote: All atheists I know (I'm including myself) accept that there is an absolute truth. They maintain that science is beginning to understand this absolute truth. They merely do not claim to completely understand this absolute truth. I have never heard of anyone who completely rejects absolute truth. I think you are confusing divine truth with absolute truth.
How will science know when it gets there?
(December 23, 2013 at 7:52 pm)MarxRaptor Wrote: You second proposition is complete bullshit. Even if we assume that nothing is objectively true (which would be ridiculous) we can still assume things to be relatively true.
What is your point of reference with which truth can be measured relatively?
If it could be proven beyond doubt that God exists...
and that He is the one spoken of in the Bible...
would you repent of your sins and place your faith in Jesus Christ?
