Is the Fall a Good Thing

[Esquilax]

Pre-fall man was not aware of sin therefore not responsiable for it or it's consenquences. Post fall man is.

It's like a 3 year old pushing his younger brother down a flight a stairs killing him, verses a 30 year old man doing the same thing.

Adam sold himself and everyone after him into slavery under sin, by giving us the knoweledge of it.

Do I even have to remind you that Adam was a pre-fall man, and hence under your own definition not responsible for his sin?

So either you're wrong, or your definitions are wrong, or god is wrong.

We are not responsiable for Adam's sin, just our own. what was passed was the awareness of sin.

So would Adam have been able to kill Eve and gotten away with it if he hadn't eaten the fruit? And if you're going to dodge by saying death came after the fall, let me broaden the scope: could Adam have committed any sin, sans fruit, and gone on scot-free?