Because Genesis is a story. Just like all other stories. I think it is a story because it violates the laws of physics and biology with the creation and Noah's ark and talking snake and I really could go on. But I think you get the idea.
So the level of evidence you require for something to be true is that someone has to say it's true? Then why isn't it sufficient that I say Genesis is a myth? You are shifting the burden of proof, you think it happened, so why not prove that? If you say it's a possibility, like I said, that's not the same as reality, that's almost saying nothing at all.
So the level of evidence you require for something to be true is that someone has to say it's true? Then why isn't it sufficient that I say Genesis is a myth? You are shifting the burden of proof, you think it happened, so why not prove that? If you say it's a possibility, like I said, that's not the same as reality, that's almost saying nothing at all.