Dear God, Eve what have you done?

[Esquilax]

In order to interpret data one must first be able to identify it. I am simply asking you to provide parameters you need to identify data.

And I told you: whatever convinced you, if you're a rational being and approaching this honestly, would be sufficient to convince me.

But you're not being rational about this, I suspect. In fact, I have almost no doubt that what actually convinced you was that you wanted to square a literal interpretation of the bible with known scientific facts, and so you invented desperately until such a thing existed.

That's why you're so unwilling to tell us what evidence convinced you. If that's not the case, what is it that's stopping you?