(January 8, 2014 at 12:55 pm)Belac Enrobso Wrote: I'm asking for the scientific kind.
What if science is not set up to process/explain everything in the universe, if science can not explain what is not known then how can 'science' be used to explain or proove God? (Because God is a current unknown to science.)
Or better yet what if the goal of 'science' is to take God out of creation by explaining the processes God used to create everything? The idea being if we can understand a process like graveity then graveity can not be of God somehow.
If this is the case then wouldn't 'science' (not the process but the commentary used to explain various evidences) be naturally at odds with the idea of God?
You said your not a fan of raceism. If you were black in the late 1960 living in mississippi, would you look to a member of the KKK to honor your civial rights? why not? Probably because the KKK member would be baised, even if this man could be considered to be good in other aspects of his life, when it comes to civial rights he would be more than lacking.
Like wise in science the conclusion maybe biased, but for the most part the data itself is generally sound. learn to take the data and think for yourself with it.
