White Privlige and Ignoring the Problem

[Ben Davis]

So show me these dozens of 'credible' studies

Here's a few to get you started, you'll have to do more research of your own if you want more info:

Influence of Social Cognitive and Ethnic Variables on Academic Goals of Underrepresented Students in Science and Engineering: A Multiple-Groups Analysis
Perceived Barriers to Education and Career: Ethnic and Gender Differences
Some influences upon the occupational aspirations of three white-collar ethnic groups

You are seriously claiming that black people utterly dominate UK sprinting because of racial stereotypes? Some sociologist came up with that one did they? Funny how sports scientists don;t seem to agree

So I have to repeat myself for the 3rd time, do I? Institutionalised discrimination is one of the reasons. It is not the only reason but it is a major influence.

Sound s like the way Christians make you want to 'ask god to come into your life'. Obviously it is also designed to make lots of money for 'diversity training' companies. I don't believe in neo marxism in any way shape or form or its bastard brother in post modernism with ots simplistic drivel of oppresed vs opressed and 'privelage'

My points have nothing to do with marxism, neo or otherwise. They have to do with the facts of the influencers of career selection in different ethnic groups. Stop trying to misrepresent my position or this conversation's over.

No it doesn't. Ranting by marxist soiciologists is not proof
[quote]
Blah, blah, blah, marxists... Blah, blah, blah, leftists... Got anything cogent to say?

[quote]You indicated that the reason was cultural

Yet again, not the reason, a reason. You're deliberately being obtuse aren't you.

Wow super arrogance- you claim 'well informed' opinions and yet you just parrot neomarxism. Yoyu sound like an ideologue to me

Dreadful ad-hom. I've parroted no-one. If neomarxism is represented by the arguments you claim I've put forward (as opposed to the points I actually made) then I am very much not one: I'd never be so simplistic. Also I'm vehemently opposed to the strictures caused by blindly following ideologies and I'm publically outspoken about that, including in posts on this forum. Even my profile states that I'm pan-political. That you're trying (and failing) to attack my character rather than my argument is telling.

You will undoubtedly love him. (Steve Rose)

Since you can't (deliberately refuse to?) even understand my perspective, you'll forgive me for taking your literary recommendations with a pinch of salt.

---

Also this: