I think my statement still stands. An absence of belief in something... a belief in nothing pertaining to an idea.. exists as an idea. Belief in God as 'non existent' also has substance as an idea demonstrably.
Does the existent thought necessitate anything further of this entity? Could the collective existent thought 'embody' the entity, if not encompass it completely?
Does the existent thought necessitate anything further of this entity? Could the collective existent thought 'embody' the entity, if not encompass it completely?