The Bible is the claim, not the evidence

[Esquilax]

So, you made all that up. Literally, you invented every word of that, and I challenge you to find a single mainstream, peer reviewed scientific paper, report or textbook that even refers to stellar evolution as a necessary component of evolution as a whole, or even mentions it as a part of evolution.

From Stars to Man

[/quote]

*Harsh buzzer*

So, let's ignore the fact that a fifty second youtube clip is not a "mainstream, peer reviewed scientific paper, report or textbook," as I asked for, because you'd be wrong even if the content of that was in report form. You've failed from the outset, but let's move on:

First of all, as Ryantology helpfully pointed out, what you showed was an analogy, not a field of scientific study. That's the important part; you're trying to overcomplicate the concept of evolution with unconnected ideas so as to invalidate evolution as it's described in real science (and if you think I'm not familiar with this Answers in Genesis, Eric Hovind bullshit, you've got another thing coming.) Yes, the atomic matter that makes us up was originally supplied by the stars, but what I think I need to note is that you originally characterized "stellar evolution" as the big bang model, and now you're talking about something else entirely. You've changed what you're talking about, and are just expecting us not to notice. Yet another failure.

Second of all, you haven't gone even an inch toward demonstrating that "stellar evolution" is present as a mainstream field of scientific study, which is what I actually care about.

And third, just to cap it off, you haven't bothered to address what I went on to say- as it invalidates the premise you were attempting to argue- which is that even if we were to accept the existence of stellar evolution, you would then be forced to admit that biological evolution, which is observed, confirmed and objectively true, could and does happen independent of the larger, stellar concept.

In essence, your entire post was a non-sequitur failure from top to bottom, and I'm also noting with interest how you ignored everything else I posted, too.