RE: one logical explanation for Materialistic Athiesm?
February 12, 2014 at 12:27 pm
(This post was last modified: February 12, 2014 at 12:28 pm by Simon Moon.)
(February 12, 2014 at 9:41 am)Bob101 Wrote: Yes I know the actual definition of Atheism, after all Buddhists and Hindu's technically Atheists. But there is a definite consensus in the current new wave of Atheism. And Atheism and Theism are not the only ways of looking at it!! This is pointless isn't it.
This just goes to show, that you actually don't know the definition of atheism. The first sign you don't know the definition is that you write it with an upper case 'A'.
Either one believes (accepts as true) in at least one god (theist) or they don't believe in at least one god (atheist). There is no other psychological state one's mind can be in.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
