RE: Questioning Darwin
February 17, 2014 at 8:30 pm
(This post was last modified: February 17, 2014 at 8:35 pm by MitchBenn.)
(February 17, 2014 at 8:05 pm)Lek Wrote:(February 17, 2014 at 7:53 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: And that's precisely what happens when people switch off their brains and go with Goddiditism - you get mouth-breathing knuckle-draggers who couldn't spot a scientific paradigm if they were in the middle of a herd of scientific paradigms, covered in scientific paradigm musk at the height of the scientific paradigm mating season and doing the scientific paradigm mating dance.
In other words, Creationists.
Boru
What's sillier?
1 - There was nothing there and then was something there.
2 - The universe always existed.
3 - God, who always existed, created the universe?
3.
As Dawkins points out, the perpetual existence or spontaneous self-generation of a mind-bogglingly vast and complex universe might seem implausible, but by definition the perpetual existence or spontaneous self-generation of a a being of such mind-MELTING complexity that it's capable of willing a mind-bogglingly vast and complex universe into being must be far MORE implausible.
