I think it's quite an obvious paradox. Given that such a container cannot exist, it doesn't actually matter though. However, by definition it has nothing in it, so it is empty, but because it holds a maximum of 0 items, it is also full.
Of course it all depends on how you defined "empty" and "full".
If empty means there aren't any items in the container (which is true), and full means you cannot place any more items in the container (which is true) then it is both empty and full, and a paradoxical container.
Of course it all depends on how you defined "empty" and "full".
If empty means there aren't any items in the container (which is true), and full means you cannot place any more items in the container (which is true) then it is both empty and full, and a paradoxical container.
