Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 22, 2025, 1:32 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
A hypothetical non-container.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
A hypothetical non-container.
Violet Offline
Buffalo and Bee Lover
*****
Religious Views: There are beeautiful cloud buffalo in the sky.
Posts: 15755
Threads: 194
Joined: May 15, 2009
Reputation: 145
#12
RE: A hypothetical non-container.
March 17, 2010 at 4:44 am (This post was last modified: March 17, 2010 at 4:45 am by Violet.)
(March 17, 2010 at 4:42 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: It isn't empty because even empty space is absolutely teeming with quantum activity apparently Big Grin

Lol
Evidence? :S

Quote:I thought 0 didn't really cant as a number and nothing didn't really count as something? So if it was truly empty then it has to be just that, truly empty - it cannot be 'full'. '0 max' just means 'nothing' doesn't it? I'm mildly confused (mildly for me that is ).

EvF

Emptiness is the state at which there is nothing. Hence to be truly empty of all things... a thing must be filled with no things. Therefore it is full of nothing... and because of that empty Smile
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Philosophy v
A hypothetical non-container.

Messages In This Thread
A hypothetical non-container. - by Tiberius - March 16, 2010 at 9:36 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by fr0d0 - March 16, 2010 at 10:08 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by tackattack - March 17, 2010 at 12:16 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 2:04 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by tackattack - March 17, 2010 at 3:15 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Darwinian - March 17, 2010 at 3:22 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 4:06 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Tiberius - March 17, 2010 at 4:03 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Tiberius - March 17, 2010 at 4:09 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 4:13 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Edwardo Piet - March 17, 2010 at 4:42 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 4:44 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Edwardo Piet - March 17, 2010 at 4:54 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Xyster - March 17, 2010 at 5:39 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Ryft - March 17, 2010 at 5:50 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 6:01 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by tackattack - March 17, 2010 at 7:09 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 7:11 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by LukeMC - March 17, 2010 at 10:42 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by tackattack - March 17, 2010 at 7:19 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by fr0d0 - March 17, 2010 at 7:32 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Rhizomorph13 - March 17, 2010 at 11:22 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 6:12 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by tackattack - March 17, 2010 at 1:13 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Rhizomorph13 - March 17, 2010 at 1:38 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Darwinian - March 17, 2010 at 1:40 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by tackattack - March 17, 2010 at 1:47 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Rhizomorph13 - March 17, 2010 at 1:47 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Darwinian - March 17, 2010 at 1:50 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by theblindferrengi - March 17, 2010 at 1:54 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 6:06 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Rhizomorph13 - March 17, 2010 at 6:11 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 17, 2010 at 6:15 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Rhizomorph13 - March 17, 2010 at 6:14 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Rhizomorph13 - March 17, 2010 at 6:26 pm
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Violet - March 19, 2010 at 6:27 am
RE: A hypothetical non-container. - by Rhizomorph13 - March 19, 2010 at 10:33 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Does the fact that many non-human animals have pituitary disprove Cartesian Dualism? FlatAssembler 36 6599 June 23, 2023 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Metaethics Part 1: Cognitivism/Non-cognitivism Disagreeable 24 4364 February 11, 2022 at 6:46 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  In Defense of a Non-Natural Moral Order Acrobat 84 16583 August 30, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 22113 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Non-existing objects KerimF 81 31759 June 28, 2017 at 2:34 am
Last Post: KerimF
  What philosophical evidence is there against believing in non-physical entities? joseph_ 150 25617 September 3, 2016 at 11:26 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  The difference between a sceptic and a non-sceptic robvalue 12 2916 May 20, 2016 at 2:55 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  God as a non-empirical being noctalla 39 8977 April 19, 2015 at 4:46 am
Last Post: robvalue
  On non-belief and the existence of God FallentoReason 72 20507 August 21, 2014 at 7:05 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Non-literal atheism? stonedape 42 11744 August 20, 2014 at 5:07 pm
Last Post: stonedape



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)