RE: A hypothetical non-container.
March 17, 2010 at 7:11 am
(This post was last modified: March 17, 2010 at 7:12 am by Violet.)
(March 17, 2010 at 7:09 am)tackattack Wrote: no Sae because the definition of a container is something that contains or keeps within limits. While your limit here is nothing or 0 therefore the definition isn't applicable.
Why couldn't a container contain nothing... in seriousness? A container might contain all of a thing, a little of a thing, a few things, something or another, or no things at all. If the limit here is that the container can only contain nothing... then why couldn't it contain nothing?
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
