(March 4, 2014 at 9:59 am)ChadWooters Wrote: I made no attempt to change if into is. I accepted the premise of the OP and showed, quite simply, that the conclusion did not follow from it. If you find my refutation lacking then you must defend the logic of the OP, not attack a claim I did not make.
Well, considering the rest of the argument, which states that a universe with a god in it has no necessarily constant rules through which we can interpret reality, simply stating the cause of that problem again doesn't exactly help your case.
Leaving aside that it's a big "if," to begin with.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
