RE: Why all "Logical Proofs Of God" fail ...
March 4, 2014 at 9:36 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2014 at 9:37 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(March 4, 2014 at 4:56 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: The unmoved mover is an historically flawed argument, with a presupposed conclusion in the premise.Please expand on your understanding of the objection. I believe the unmoved mover argument remains sound. I don’t know the specifics of the objection to which you are refer, but I do know that the objections of which I am aware are themselves flawed.