(March 6, 2014 at 3:45 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You still don't get it, I specifically asked about the story that HE LINKED because I know he would never admit to being wrong. The honest answer is that the word "Christ" doesn't appear anywhere in his article, but instead of admitting it, he avoids the question altogether.
That's not why you asked it, you little shit. You think people can't go back a page and see your conclusion sentence?
Quote:So I guess that makes it religious the same way scientists referring to the Higgs boson as the "God" particle makes them religious.
Since you're so obsessed with not making assumptions, where did I ever say the doctor or the shot were religious? What you did was make an inference based on context- the very same thing you don't want us to do when it reflects badly on your religion- and tried to distance that same religion from any sense of wrongdoing. Else why would you make reference to the doctor's religion at all, if all you were doing was trying to demonstrate that I wouldn't admit that I was wrong over a baffling, petty detail?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!